در هنگام جستجو کلمه در قسمت عنوان میتوانید کلمات مورد جستجو را با کاراکتر (-) جدا کنید.
کاربرد نوع شرط:
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Future of Medical Education Journal
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Nurses,Organizational Culture,Educational,Educationalatmosphere,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Hospitals
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Background: Hospitals and health care centers, like any other organizations, have some common norms and beliefs known as organizational culture. Organizational culture plays key roles in organizations and have impressive impacts on nurses’ performances. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between organizational culture and education of nursing staff employed in educational hospitals based on Denison Model and DREEM.
Methods: This study is a descriptive, analytical survey conducted in 2015. The Target population of the present consisted of educational hospital’s nurses and paramedics. 200 nurses and paramedics have been selected using a random systematic method. Using a standard questionnaire of Denison and Dream which were validated and reliable, data were gathered. To analyze data, SPSS software version 16and T-test, ANOVA, regression, were used.
Results: DREEM organizational culture questionnaire consisted of four dimensions. Percentage adjustment accounted for dimensions of organizational culture; mission (78.9%), later involvement (13.2%) and adaptability (4%) are as mentioned. Finally, the dimensions of organizational culture have managed to 96.1% of educational environment which demonstrated a significant positive correlation between these two variables (P <0.01).
Conclusions: The organizational culture of S-Faghihi hospital (one of the educational hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) showed a better situation than a Namazee Educational Hospital. Organizational culture as a decisive excellence factor in hospitals’ teaching improved the educational environment and ultimately improved student learning and educational consequences such as productivity and health of the patient.- انتشار مقاله: 11-06-1395
- نویسندگان: Leila Bazrafcan,Mitra Amini,Shirin Ghanavati,Mohamad Jafary,Samira Sheibanian
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Indicator,Medical education,Schools,Social accountability
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Introduction: Social accountability has received much research attention in recent decades. Social accountability has been identified as an important prerequisite in development; however different development targets each have a particular definition of social accountability. The aim of this study was to provide indicators for application in making assessments for the progress of medical science colleges and institutions towards social accountability. Method: This research was conducted as a qualitative study in 2015. The research aimed to explore indicators of social accountability in medical science training institutions using three rounds of the Delphi technique. A group of experts was gathered from among all regions of Iran. Prior to the first round of Delphi, some proposed measures were identified from a review of the related literature. In the first round, content validity ratio values were determined for each indicator and accountability assessment was the made by the group of experts. In the second round of Delphi, item-content validity index determinations were made according to relevance and clarity of the indicators. In the third final round, confirmation of indicators was made by the group of experts. Results: The four main domains of organization and performance, educational activities, research activities and cooperation in health services in society and region, were confirmed using the Delphi method. Finally, 58 objective indicators were listed for these 4 domains. Conclusion: Determination of national criteria for evaluating social accountability is a major step toward improving accountability in medical training institutions. Evaluations for medical training institutions based on criteria derived from this study were determined as efficient. But further research is needed on function of the mentioned criteria in relation to fulfilling the needs of society.
- انتشار مقاله: 11-10-1398
- نویسندگان: Hajar Shieh,Shirin Ghanavati,Parisa Nabeiei,Mitra Amini
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی:
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Introduction : Social accountability has received much research attention in recent decades. Social accountability has been identified as an important prerequisite in development; however different development targets each have a particular definition of social accountability. The aim of this study was to provide indicators for application in making assessments for the progress of medical science colleges and institutions towards social accountability. Methods : This research was conducted as a qualitative study in 2015. The research aimed to explore indicators of social accountability in medical science training institutions using three rounds of the Delphi technique. A group of experts was gathered from among all regions of Iran. Prior to the first round of Delphi, some proposed measures were identified from a review of the related literature. In the first round, content validity ratio values were determined for each indicator and accountability assessment was the made by the group of experts. In the second round of Delphi, item-content validity index determinations were made according to relevance and clarity of the indicators. In the third final round, confirmation of indicators was made by the group of experts. Results : The four main domains of organization and performance, educational activities, research activities and cooperation in health services in society and region, were confirmed using the Delphi method. Finally, 58 objective indicators were listed for these 4 domains. Conclusions : Determination of national criteria for evaluating social accountability is a major step toward improving accountability in medical training institutions. Evaluations for medical training institutions based on criteria derived from this study were determined as efficient. But further research is needed on function of the mentioned criteria in relation to fulfilling the needs of society.
- انتشار مقاله: 11-10-1348
- نویسندگان: Hajar Shieh,Parisa Nabeiei,Shirin Ghanavati,Mitra Amini,Elham Akbari,Robert-Jan Simons
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Women’s Health Bulletin
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Women,Challenges,Job satisfaction,Opportunities
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Background: Women comprise more than half of the world's population. In different societies, because of different views and attitudes, women are affected by various factors such as culture, customs, religion, economy and etc.
Objectives: The present research attempts to determine why medical students are interested in general medicine and how they seek job satisfaction. In this connection, it is also important to know about the existing problems and barriers and to propose approaches to prevent them.
Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study is comprised of female medical students of whom 100 were randomly selected using random numbers table. Data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire including 20 questions. Validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by the medical education academics and its reliability was checked by a pilot study of 20 medical students which was considered 86% according to Cronbachs’ Alpha. The data analysis was done using SPSS version 14.
Results: With respect to marital status, 22% and 78% of the participants were married and single 78% were, with their average age being 26 ± 0.98 SD years. Respectively also their job satisfaction mean score was 4.19 ± 1.51 out of 7 which showed no significant association between job satisfaction and marriage and they exhibited positive attitude toward General Medicine (P = 0.639, 0.002). There was a significant association between job satisfaction and attitude of women toward their husbands who were practicing physician (P = 0.018).
Conclusions: According to the results of this study, as the majority of the target population comprised women with family responsibilities, stakeholders and other program designers are recommended to provide special facilities in order to increase job and education opportunities for women.- انتشار مقاله: 11-10-1348
- نویسندگان: Yasamin Dianat,Mitra Amini,Shirin Ghanavati,Parisa Nabeiei,Mohammad Jafari,Farnaz Takmil
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی:
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: As hemophilia is a chronic bleeding diseaseand can interfere with daily performanceof children, these children require continuoustraining to prevent bleeding and take timely action(1). Since children nurses play an important role inthe education of involved children and their Selfefficacyand also due to today’s approach whichis using educational computer games, the use ofeducational games in respect to teach hemophiliachildren how to have self-efficacy can beeffective (2). Hemoaction game is a computerizededucational game designed by the World Federationof Hemophilia to educate hemophilia disease andrelated procedures to the care of children withhemophilia. By the use of this game children withhemophilia (aged 8-12) and also nursing expertswere educated how to increase self efficacy.Nursing School of Shiraz University ofMedical Sciences has used this game for thefirst time after its publishing, in the world (3).The results of the mentioned study demonstratesthat after the Hemophilia disease and its relatedprocedures were instructed to children withhemophilia and nursing experts in order toknow how to increase patients’ self efficacy bymodern approaches, self efficacy of hemophiliachildren and nurses were both improved. Thiseducational method is a novel way to enhanceboth Hemophilia children and nursing staff,as major participants in routine and lifelongeducation process, self-efficacy.Due to nurses’ important role in improvingchildren with hemophilia self-efficacy by differentinstructions and world leading educationalapproaches towards use of modern technology ineducation, using Hemoaction educational game,published by World Federation of Hemophilia andused by Nursing and Midwifery College of ShirazUniversity of Medical Sciences for the first time,can fulfill hemophilia children needs of care.
- انتشار مقاله: 03-07-1395
- نویسندگان: NOOASHIN BEHESHTIPOOR,SHIRIN GHANAVATI,MITRA EDRAKI,MEHRAN KARIMI,SEZANEH HAGHPANAH
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی:
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Introduction: Obtaining clinical competency in clinical educationis one of the problems in nursing and use of the new methods ofclinical training is very important. Clinical supervision is one ofthe methods used as a mechanism to promote knowledge and skillfor promoting professional performance in nursing students. Thisstudy is carried out to determine the impact of clinical supervisionon field training of nursing students at Urmia University ofMedical Sciences.Methods: In the present experimental study, 32 nursing studentswere enrolled in the study based on census and randomlyassigned into two groups of experimental and control by blockrandomization. Clinical supervision was used in the experimentalgroup and the control group received routine clinical trainingsin the field. The students’ clinical skills were assessed using aresearcher-made checklist, the validity of which was confirmedthrough content validity method by 13 faculty members andits reliability was approved by test-retest method on 20 nursingstudents in the form of a pilot study and through Cronbach’s alpha(87%). Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 14.Results: There was a significant difference between theexperimental and control groups in clinical skills such asrecognition and administration of medication, team participation,patients and their relatives’ education, considering the safety,infection prevention and nursing process (p<0.005).Conclusion: The study demonstrated that in clinical supervisionprocess, students have a better communication and cooperationwith their instructor and with each other and their confidence andunderstanding and the amount of learning in practical skills wasenhanced more than routine clinical training. The implementationof this clinical training method for students of nursing and otherfields of medical sciences is recommendable.Keywords: Clinical; Nursing; Training; Students
- انتشار مقاله: 19-12-1394
- نویسندگان: MOHAMMADREZA DEHGHANI,SHIRIN GHANAVATI,BEHROUZ SOLTANI,NADER AGHAKHANI,SEZANEH HAGHPANAH
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی:
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: As Medical sciences become more advanced andgrow each day, so do the challenges of medicaleducation. To overcome the new obstacles whichare an inseparable part of science evolution, it isnecessary to renew and improve the educationalsystem .Achieving this, requires individuals whoare educated in the new methods of learning andtherefore can lead others through educationalsystem development. During the past decade,these facts have led many medical universitiestoward establishing and pursuing new masterand PhD. programs of medical education. As aPioneer in the field of medical education and thefirst teacher training center in EMRO since 1972,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS)has also contributed to educational systemtransformation by establishing master courses inmedical education since 2008, with a goal of notonly updating faculties` educational knowledgebut also training efficient educational experts. InSUMS, these courses which are also mentionedin Dr. ARA Tekian’s article in Chicago University(1), were designed based on reviewing what Someof the greatest universities in the field of educationsuch as Dundee, Maastricht and Chicago Universityhave done. The courses last for five semestersand are available for all medical and paramedicalfaculty members, GPs and paramedical masters.To enter the program applicants must send theirresume including their degree, previous education,and published articles. Moreover, they must alsotake part in an entrance exam which evaluatestheir knowledge of general English language alongwith their educational knowledge and computerskills. These courses are conducted using thenewest methods and references of learning suchas “A practical guide for medical teachers” (2).The students are also asked to study the mostrecent AMME Guidelines which are provided forthem. According to students’ work field, in eachsemester, proper homework has been considered toimprove what they’ve been instructed in practice.After becoming educational experts, thesestudents can be hired in different sections ofeducation departments, acting as educationalambassadors, initiating educational leaders &curriculums designers which, in turn, can littleby little change the culture and face of education,hoping that these changes may someday result inspurring medical educational system.
- انتشار مقاله: 05-07-1394
- نویسندگان: FARNAZ TAKMIL,MITRA AMINI,PARISA NABEIEI,LEILA BAZRAFKAN,MOHAMMAD REZA DEHGHANI,RITA REZAEE,SHIRIN GHANAVATI,JAVAD KOJURI
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی:
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Introduction: The importance of medical profession and therole of the physician in society is no secret to anyone. Skills andcompetencies in clinical practice are necessary for the medicalprofession. In fact, in patient care, doctors require practical skillsin addition to scientific knowledge. This study examines thepotentials of medical school students in three areas of doing theright thing, doing the right thing in an intermediate range, anddoing the right thing by the right person.Methods: This study was done in a descriptive-analytical andsectional model. The population of this study was all internsof Shiraz University of Medical Sciences who were passinginternship at Internal Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, Obstetrics andEmergency wards. About 100 persons were selected were selectedby simple randomization. In order to collect data, a questionnairewith 12 questions was designed in two parts. The questionnairewas approved by 7 Faculty members of Clinical Medicine andMedical Education, and its reliability was approved by test-retestmethod on 20 medical students in the form of a pilot study andthrough Cronbach’s alpha (82%). Collected data were analyzed bySPSS software version 14 using descriptive statistical methods.Results: Results showed that within the inner circle, internsevaluated their skills in surgery, internal medicine, andgynecology wards, intermediate and at other wards as weak. Alsowithin the center circle, interns evaluated adequate educationalevidence-based training in the field of medicine, and sufficiencyof educational training in the field of clinical decision making andclinical care as suitable.Conclusion: According to the results, it seems that medicalinterns’ skills in performing most medical skills are moderate.So teaching students by new educational methods and workshoptechniques, using experienced teachers will be effective. Theuse of clinical skills training centers and objective assessmentmethods for the students’ skills, especially before entering theclinical departments, is very important.Keywords: Student; Assessment; Clinical skills
- انتشار مقاله: 05-07-1394
- نویسندگان: MITRA AMINI,SAMANEH ABIRI,PARISA NABEIEI,SHIRIN GHANAVATI,ALI ASGHAR HAYAT,JAVAD KOJURI
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی:
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Introduction: Research in education is a globally significant issuewithout a long history. Due to the importance of the issue in HealthSystem Development programs, this study intended to determineresearch priorities in medical education, considering their detailsand functions. By determining barriers existing in research ineducation progress, it is tried to make research priorities morefunctional by recommending acceptable strategies.Methods: This is a qualitative-descriptive study in two descriptivephases. The goal of these phases was to determine researchpriorities subcategories in medical education by Nominal GroupTechnique (NGT) and two rounds of Delphi method. Through thefirst phase, subcategories of research priorities were determined,using Nominal Group Technique under medical education experts’supervision. Through two rounds of Delphi, a questionnaire wasconstructed based on the subcategories. Eventually, researchpriorities were determined based on their highest score (scoresmore than 7 out of 10).Results: In the first phase (NGT), 35 priorities in 5 major fieldsof medical education were presented. In the second phase,priorities were scored, using Delphi method. Medical Ethicsand professionalism gained the highest scores (7.63±1.26) andeducational evaluation the lowest (7.28±1.52). In this stage, 7items were omitted but 2 of them were added again after experts’revision in the third round of Delphi.Conclusion: According to the results of the present study andbased on previous studies, it really seems that the fields of“Learning and Teaching Approaches” and “Medical Ethics andProfessionalism” were more important. Because of financial andresource limitations in our country and the importance of researchpriorities, it is recommended to frequently study “researchpriorities determination program” at universities.Keywords: Research priorities; Medical education; Delphi method
- انتشار مقاله: 07-10-1394
- نویسندگان: PARISA NABEIEI,MITRA AMINI,SHIRIN GHANAVATI,SAADAT MARHAMATI
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Future of Medical Education Journal
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Nurses,Organizational Culture,Educational,Educationalatmosphere,Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Hospitals
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Background: Hospitals and health care centers, like any other organizations, have some common norms and beliefs known as organizational culture. Organizational culture plays key roles in organizations and have impressive impacts on nurses’ performances. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between organizational culture and education of nursing staff employed in educational hospitals based on Denison Model and DREEM.
Methods: This study is a descriptive, analytical survey conducted in 2015. The Target population of the present consisted of educational hospital’s nurses and paramedics. 200 nurses and paramedics have been selected using a random systematic method. Using a standard questionnaire of Denison and Dream which were validated and reliable, data were gathered. To analyze data, SPSS software version 16and T-test, ANOVA, regression, were used.
Results: DREEM organizational culture questionnaire consisted of four dimensions. Percentage adjustment accounted for dimensions of organizational culture; mission (78.9%), later involvement (13.2%) and adaptability (4%) are as mentioned. Finally, the dimensions of organizational culture have managed to 96.1% of educational environment which demonstrated a significant positive correlation between these two variables (P <0.01).
Conclusions: The organizational culture of S-Faghihi hospital (one of the educational hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) showed a better situation than a Namazee Educational Hospital. Organizational culture as a decisive excellence factor in hospitals’ teaching improved the educational environment and ultimately improved student learning and educational consequences such as productivity and health of the patient.- انتشار مقاله: 11-06-1395
- نویسندگان: Leila Bazrafcan,Mitra Amini,Shirin Ghanavati,Mohamad Jafary,Samira Sheibanian
- مشاهده