در هنگام جستجو کلمه در قسمت عنوان میتوانید کلمات مورد جستجو را با کاراکتر (-) جدا کنید.
کاربرد نوع شرط:
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: attitudes,Autonomous Learning,Classroom Engagement,Flipped Teaching,Google Classroom
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Flipped teaching is the process of moving lecture content from face-to-face class time to before class. The potential values of flipped teaching in which learners are actively engaged in the learning process have been emphasized during the past years; however, there is still little research evidence about the attitudes of the learners towards flipped teaching and the use of technology. The present investigation aimed to explore Iranian EFL learners' attitudes towards flipped teaching. To this end, 40 female intermediate EFL learners with the age range of 19 to 29 from the training department of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) in Khuzestan, Iran, based on the Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) were selected through convenience sampling and assigned into two groups with the same instructional strategies since having 40 students in a single class was not possible. An attitude questionnaire was examined in terms of frequencies and percentages. The results of frequency analyses indicated that EFL learners in the study had a positive attitude towards flipped teaching and agreed that it was helpful to them in many ways. The findings can be of significance for EFL learners, instructors, and syllabus designers.
- انتشار مقاله: 17-07-1398
- نویسندگان: Sara Shahani,Azizeh Chalak,Hossein Heidari Tabrizi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: rating scale,Keywords: Iranian EFL Context,Self-Evaluation,Students’ Ratings,Teacher Evaluation Scheme
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Abstract
This study investigated Iranian EFL instructor evaluation scheme from end-users’ perspective: self-evaluation vs. students’ ratings. To do so, in the second semester of 2015-2016, 60 instructors and 1000 students of English Department of Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, )IAUIB(, were selected as those from whom the corpus of the study was extracted. The corpus was provided by administrating two rating scales online via the university website on each person’s profile. Then the results of their completed evaluation rating scales were compared. The study was accomplished through a non-experimental descriptive correlational design. The results revealed that almost no relationship was found between Iranian EFL instructors’ self-evaluation and those done by their students at IAUIB. This study could benefit Iranian educationalists, policy makers, and evaluators in making informed pedagogical decisions and conducting more efficient teacher evaluation in English education of Iran.
- انتشار مقاله: 27-06-1396
- نویسندگان: Fateme Naderian,Azizeh Chalak,Ahmad Ali Foroughi,Hossein Heidari Tabrizi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: communicative competence,Textbook evaluation,CLT,learners’ needs,Iranian Teachers’ and Learners’ Attitude
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: The quality of a textbook might have fundamental roles that it can determine the success or failure in teaching and learning course. The present study evaluated English textbooks used in Iranian high schools, which are claimed to have been published based on the components of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach. The purpose of this study was to explore high school teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards the Iranian high school English textbooks. To fulfill the objectives, a questionnaire consisting of 45 questions related to high school English textbooks was administered to 150 male and female high school students and their teachers in Isfahan, Iran. The participants were also interviewed in terms of their attitudes towards CLT and its implementation in Iranian high school English textbooks. The descriptive analysis of the data indicated that Iranian teachers and learners in Isfahan had a positive attitude towards the English textbooks based on the CLT principles. The majority of participants stated that 80 percent of CLT principles were currently practiced in Iranian high school English textbooks; however, some changes might improve the quality of these English textbooks.
- انتشار مقاله: 11-05-1394
- نویسندگان: Firouzeh Torki,Azizeh Chalak
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: L2 writing,EAP,Metadiscourse,Code gloss,Discourse Studies
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: One of the challenges of academic writing is the creation of a structurally and communicatively well-organized and coherent text. Metadiscourse enables authors of journal articles to achieve this goal by raising the writers‘ awareness about discourse features which can contribute to a better academic content production. Also, L1 background has always been a hot topic in applied linguistics and native versus non-native comparisons have been of particular interest in this field. The purpose of this study was to see whether native English speakers and Iranians use code glosses as a sub-category of metadiscourse similarly in their academic writings. To this end, the introduction section of 30 journal articles written by native and Iranian non-native English authors were investigated and the number of code-glosses in each group was counted and analyzed. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to answer the research question of this study. The result of data analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between the frequency count of code glosses used by Iranian and native English authors. This study can have pedagogical implications for EAP course designers as well as academic writing instructors and students.
- انتشار مقاله: 10-09-1396
- نویسندگان: Mahdi Dehghan,Azizeh Chalak
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Routine Formulas,Gambits,Gambit Tokens,Gambit Categories
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Conversations contain spontaneous use of routine formulas which lets speaker sinteract with each other to express opinions. Gambits, as one of these formulas, act as an opening remark and help speakers to maintain the smooth flow of an everyday conversation. The lack of mastery of using gambits in maintaining the conversation leads to breakdowns in speaking. This paper aimedat comparingthe use of different categories of gambitsby native speakers of English and Persian. Toachieve this end, a corpus of 40 hours from Persian Native Speakers (PNSs) and English Native Speakers (ENSs) with an equal number of participants was selected through recordings of conversations from different TV Channels. Following the literature, the frequency of gambit tokens was counted and their functions were classified. Chi-square test revealed significant differences between PNSs and ENSs regarding the occurrences of gambit categories. The findings of this study can have implications for language learners and practitioners in the field. The present research demonstrates to language learners the need for learning gambit expressions as elements to improve the quality of their speaking and also to use the language in meaningful interaction with others.
- انتشار مقاله: 11-10-1348
- نویسندگان: Azizeh Chalak,Zahra Norouzi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of studies in learning and teaching English
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: attitude,Partnership Approach,Interaction,students’ engagement
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: This study aimed at investigating the Iranian undergraduate EFL students’ and teachers’ attitude towards Partnership Approach as a new way of engaging learners in the learning process. A descriptive, ethnographic research method, using a questionnaire along with focus group semi-structured interview, was employed. Seventy-two undergraduate EFL learners and 40 EFL teachers with more than ten years of experience in teaching English were included in the study. They were
males and females of different ages. They responded to two different attitude questionnaires. Some of the participants were randomly interviewed to shed light on the accuracy of the information collected. The results indicated that both students and teachers had a significantly positive attitude towards the Partnership Approach. The EFL teachers
appeared to hold a more positive attitude and were inclined to support the students’ engagement and the implementation of the Partnership Approach, believing that partnership increases interaction in the classroom, enhances the quality of teaching and learning, and makes the management of the classroom easier. The EFL learners claimed they
would learn better and with higher quality, enjoy more, feel more responsible, and have more opportunities to evaluate themselves in such classes. They added it would be interesting to have a part in creating the material.- انتشار مقاله: 27-04-1398
- نویسندگان: Sousan Sattar,Azizeh Chalak,Hossein Heidari Tabrizi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Journal of Teaching Language Skills
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Learners' narrative,Participatory learning,Photovoice,Reflective narrative
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Photovoice is a participatory action research method which aims to enable students to create compelling visual representations and identify the local social issues. This paper attempted to investigate the impact of photovoice as an innovative method on the levels of reflection manifested in EFL learners' narratives. To this end, a convenience sample of 48 Iranian intermediate EFL learners including 17 males and 31 females, learning English in two institutes located in Isfahan, Iran, were chosen. Before research implementation, the participants were provided with comprehensive photovoice guidance and workshop. The learners had to present their photos and narratives during a semester which took about two months. The collected data include 237 photographs and 48 essays which were learners' critical reflection on the photos. Then, the levels of reflection in their narratives were measured by Kember (2008) and Ryan and Ryan's (2012) frameworks. According to the results, poverty and air pollution were the most prominent social concerns captured by the participants. Furthermore, photovoice incredibly fostered Iranian EFL learners' reflection, and they all had positive attitudes toward participatory learning. This study could have pedagogical implications for the learners and practitioners in the field of SLA. They can employ innovative methods such as photovoice as a participatory learning tool to improve critical reflection.
- انتشار مقاله: 10-05-1397
- نویسندگان: Mahzad Karimi,Azizeh Chalak,Hossein Heidari Tabrizi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: engagement,Partnership Approach,Mixed-Ability Language Classrooms,Streamed Language Classrooms
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Introducing effective approaches and providing equal opportunities for all language learners at any level of language knowledge to learn successfully seems to be an asset. In this study, the role of employing Partnership Approach (PA) to teach speaking to undergraduate EFL students through Streaming/Homogeneous-Grouping of the learners in Mixed-Ability classrooms was examined. A quasi-experimental research method was employed and 72 Iranian male and female undergraduate students majoring in TEFL whose ages ranged from 19-24 participated in the study. The study comprised three experimental and three control groups in high, low, and mixed language-ability levels based on the results of an Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) so that there were 12 students in each group. The findings indicated that among the streamed experimental groups, low-ability students did not significantly develop their speaking ability. On the contrary, low-ability students benefited from the mixed-ability teaching more than the other students both in the control and the experimental groups. Mixed-ability and high-ability students in the experimental group significantly outperformed their counterparts in the control group. Low-ability students in the control group outperformed their counterparts in the experimental group. This study has the potential to develop new insights and ideas which can be adapted by both EFL teachers and students in different educational settings. The processes and outcomes of the study can be adapted for use in other disciplines to examine the effect of ability grouping and partnership on the individuals’ overall success.
- انتشار مقاله: 04-01-1397
- نویسندگان: Sousan Sattar Boroujeni,Azizeh Chalak,Hossein Heidari Tabrizi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Speaking Skill,self-confidence,Hybrid Problem-based Learning,Pure Problem-based Learning
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Problem-based Learning (PBL) as one of the newest teaching methods in the area of language teaching in second and foreign contexts, has been used by teachers in the last two decades in different institutes. In the current study, attempts were made to find out the effect of the two PBL subcategories, i.e. Hybrid Problem-based Learning (H-PBL) and Pure Problem-based Learning (PPBL) in comparison to a traditional lecture-based method, on Iranian EFL university learners’ speaking skill and their self-confidence, by implementing these two methods in the EFL classroom using eight teacher-made real-world problems. To this purpose, 56 undergraduate participants of Payam Noor university (PNU) in Abadan, Iran, were randomly selected, divided into a control group and two treatment HPBL and PPBL groups. The statistical analysis of the obtained results of the participants’ pretest-posttest scores, through one-way ANCOVA and Man-Whitney U test, revealed that the treatment groups outperformed the control group in speaking skill and self-confidence The findings of the study might bear implications for teachers and university curriculum designers to take more proper approaches towards the instructing university participants.
- انتشار مقاله: 24-04-1399
- نویسندگان: Jamal Montafej,Ahmadreza Lotfi,Azizeh Chalak
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Cognitive dependency,disputational talk,Exploratory-cumulative talk,translator training courses
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: The present study set out to determine the effect of implementing exploratory-cumulative talk in comparison to disputational talk on cognitive (meaning development and organization of thought as well as problem solving ability) dependency of intermediate level students in translation studies. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, a quasi-experimental-pretest-posttest-statistical study was conducted in which 63 linguistically homogeneous B.A students in translation studies at the IAU-Shahreza branch, in experimental and control groups were the participants. Administering cognitive dependency questionnaire before and after implementing the treatment, exploratory-cumulative talk, helps the researcher to find out the possible effect of it against the control group, disputational talk, in translator training courses. The results of the data analysis indicate that the difference between the posttest mean scores of the experimental and control groups do not reach statistical significance. However, by conventional criteria, the difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the experimental group was considered statistically significant by large effect size. The application of the present study findings in translator training courses may pave the way for translation teachers and translation students to follow more fruitful approaches.
- انتشار مقاله: 22-07-1399
- نویسندگان: Samaneh Yazdani,Hossein Heidari Tabrizi,Azizeh Chalak
- مشاهده