در هنگام جستجو کلمه در قسمت عنوان میتوانید کلمات مورد جستجو را با کاراکتر (-) جدا کنید.
کاربرد نوع شرط:
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Syntactic Complexity,academic writing,Coh-Metrix,contrastive rhetoric,Ph.D Dissertation
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: The present study sought to identify the similarities and/or differences between texts written by Iranian university students of English teaching major and those written by English natives in terms of syntactic complexity. To this end, an automated computational web tool, namely Coh-Metrix was used to scrutinize a corpus containing 83 text excerpts extracted from 10 dissertations written by Iranian Ph.D. students as well as a comparison corpus including 94 text excerpts selected from 10 Ph.D. dissertations written by English native speakers in terms of four specific measures representing syntactic complexity. The results indicated that among the four measures, Mean Number of Modifiers and Sentence Syntax Similarity functioned as distinctive factors differentiating between the first language (L1) and second language (L2) texts, whereas Left Embeddedness and Minimal Edit Distance were found to be similar between the two corpora. The findings may have several implications for EFL practitioners.
- انتشار مقاله: 18-07-1397
- نویسندگان: Masoud Azadnia,Ahmadreza Lotfi,Reza Biria
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: Research in English Language Pedagogy
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Corpus linguistics,Comparative Forms,Concordancing
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی:
In the introductory stages of language learning, students are exposed to
parative forms explicitly taught in their textbooks. As Knoch (2004) mthis is accomplished by teaching the comparative form of the adjective generally
directly followed by a than clause. This study aimed to compare between native and nonnative material developers with regard to the coverage of
comparative forms. In doing so, two corpora of high school changes were developed and juxtaposed. The data were gathered books and converting them into computerized forms. The data by the frequency percentages of the forms and further examined and compared as
well. The results revealed that there was a significant difference corpora with regard to the coverage of comparative forms.- انتشار مقاله: 13-04-1391
- نویسندگان: Ghazaleh Shafeniya,AhmadReza Lotfi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: explicit instruction,implicit instruction,Textual input enhancement,definite articles,indefinite articles
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: The present study aims at investigating the differential effects of two types of instruction (explicit versus implicit) on the learning of English articles by Iranian EFL learners. To achieve this aim, 90 intermediate undergraduate students at Islamic Azad University, Shahreza Branch, whose major was English Translation were selected for the experiment. Then, they were divided into three groups namely, explicit group (EG), implicit group (IG), and control group (CG). The EG received instruction on English articles through two popular grammar books-- namely ‘Essential Grammar in Use’ by Murphy (1998) and ‘Oxford Practice Grammar’ by Eastwood (1999). The second group received instruction on English articles by employing the technique of textual input enhancement. The third group received similar instruction like IG except that English articles were not enhanced for this group. After analyzing the data on pre- and posttests, the results showed that the three groups of EG, IG, and CG improved significantly from pretest to posttests. Moreover, on the posttest, the EG learners significantly outweighed the IG learners, who were in turn found to be significantly better than their counterparts in the CG. The results of this study have several important implications for the classroom practice concerning the controversial issue of teaching English articles.
- انتشار مقاله: 30-03-1399
- نویسندگان: Nasser Khodaeian,Ehsan Rezvani,Ahmadreza Lotfi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Speaking Skill,self-confidence,Hybrid Problem-based Learning,Pure Problem-based Learning
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Problem-based Learning (PBL) as one of the newest teaching methods in the area of language teaching in second and foreign contexts, has been used by teachers in the last two decades in different institutes. In the current study, attempts were made to find out the effect of the two PBL subcategories, i.e. Hybrid Problem-based Learning (H-PBL) and Pure Problem-based Learning (PPBL) in comparison to a traditional lecture-based method, on Iranian EFL university learners’ speaking skill and their self-confidence, by implementing these two methods in the EFL classroom using eight teacher-made real-world problems. To this purpose, 56 undergraduate participants of Payam Noor university (PNU) in Abadan, Iran, were randomly selected, divided into a control group and two treatment HPBL and PPBL groups. The statistical analysis of the obtained results of the participants’ pretest-posttest scores, through one-way ANCOVA and Man-Whitney U test, revealed that the treatment groups outperformed the control group in speaking skill and self-confidence The findings of the study might bear implications for teachers and university curriculum designers to take more proper approaches towards the instructing university participants.
- انتشار مقاله: 24-04-1399
- نویسندگان: Jamal Montafej,Ahmadreza Lotfi,Azizeh Chalak
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Picture Description Task,second language acquisition,Functional Projections,grammaticality judgment task,L2 learner
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Unlike Lexical Projections, Functional Projections (Extended Projections) are more of an ‘abstract’ in nature. Therefore, Functional Projections seem to be acquired later than Lexical Projections by the L2 learners. The present study investigates Iranian L2 learners’ acquisition of English Extended Projections taking into account their level of grammatical proficiency. Specifically, the aim is to identify the level of grammatical proficiency at which the acquisition of Extended Projections could occur in the process of learning English by the Iranian students. Two hundred and seventy Iranian female L2 learners of English participated in this study. Participants were administered three tests with a ten-day interval between each test. First, an Oxford Placement Test (OPT) was used to classify the participants’ level of grammatical proficiency. Second, a Grammaticality Judgment Task (GJT) was administered in order to assess the learners’ ability to recognize grammatical problems in Extended Projections. Finally, a picture description task (PDT) was administered to examine the learners’ ability to produce grammatical Extended Projections. The results indicated that the learners are able to recognize and produce English Extended Projections even at lower levels of grammatical proficiency. The results also showed that the learner’s recognition and production of English Extended Projection improves with their increased level of grammatical proficiency.
- انتشار مقاله: 02-05-1399
- نویسندگان: Fariba Khorvash,Ahmadreza Lotfi,Ahmad Ameri-Golestan
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: reflective inquiry,Professional Development,Collaborative Action Research,Community of Shared Knowledge,Action Research Projects
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Teacher professional development, as a burgeoning term, has attracted a surge of interest in English language teaching. In second language (L2) professional development, the common orthodoxy has been one which considers teachers as that of knowledge consumers. It is commonly argued that top-down approaches to teachers’ professional development has done little to maximize teachers’ professionalism. To unravel the above-mentioned dilemma, this study was an attempt to implement collaborative action research, as a viable means, to boost teachers’ professional development in a networked community of shared knowledge. To this end, thirteen male and female Iranian English teachers, within the age range of 22-35, were selected through convenience sampling. The selected participants were added to a group in WhatsApp. The online classes began with plenary debate, mostly in the form of workshops through problematizing a particular topic, which were directly linked to teachers’ actual teaching experience. Insights into the EFL teachers’ professional development were acquired through the triangulation of data from four main sources (i.e., teachers’ professional journals, reflective journals, action research projects, and semi-structured interviews). The findings revealed that engaging EFL teachers in a collaborative dialogue in a networked community of shared knowledge ultimately culminated in development of action research projects which resulted in sustained L2 professional development, whereby participating teachers developed a broader understanding of research and adopted reflective inquiry in their L2 teaching practices. The findings have important implications for language teachers in general, and EFL teachers, syllabus designers, and material developers, in particular.
- انتشار مقاله: 12-03-1399
- نویسندگان: Farzad Mashhadi,Reza Biria,Ahmadreza Lotfi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: perception,collaborative writing,E-collaborative Writing,Journal Writing,Process Writing
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: This study investigates the benefits of e-collaborative and collaborative writing tasks on the perception of Iranian EFL learners in a process-oriented approach. The study involved 74 intermediate Iranian EFL students at Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch. They were divided into three groups by random assignment as two experimental groups and one control group. The experimental groups were required to perform their tasks in collaboration; only one of these two groups had access to the Telegram Application outside the classroom. The control group, however, followed the conventional method of learning how to write. The participants were required to write two journals during the course. They were asked to write about their understanding, attitude, and experience on the writing activity. There were 136 diary entries to be analyzed in order to discover the themes in them. These themes were literally the emerging concepts in the diary entries related to research question of the study about the participants’ perception. After the identification of these dominant themes, content analysis was performed to interpret the data. According to the results of the study, a high percentage of students’ satisfaction showed positive perceptions of e-collaborative activities, and they reported that the instructional implementation of an e-collaborative writing project with a five-stage writing process did assist EFL learners to accomplish a collaborative writing task.
- انتشار مقاله: 25-02-1398
- نویسندگان: Nazli Azodi,Ahmadreza Lotfi,Ahmad Ameri-Golestan
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: Oral Proficiency,English as a foreign language (EFL),Unplugged Classroom Model (UCM),Community of Inquiry (Co I),non-conventional instruction
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: Recent thrust of research has focused on non-conventional classrooms for teaching to EFL learners. Amongst the newly developed models, Unplugged Classroom Model (UCM) is the most debated one as textbooks are aside and the syllabus is based on conversation-driven activities. This study sought to determine the pros and cons of unplugged teaching for enhancing EFL learners' oral proficiency. From a pool of 317 intermediate and upper-intermediate Iranian EFL learners, 120 intermediate and upper-intermediate learners (60 each) were selected based on SPEAK NOW 1-4 Interview Placement Exam and were divided into conventional and non-conventional classrooms at each proficiency level. The participants in the non-conventional classrooms received unplugged instruction; whereas, their counterparts in the control group (conventional) classrooms were taught according to their textbook's instruction. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to measure learners' performances before and after instruction through paper-based exams and interviews. Participants' perspectives and viewpoints in the non-conventional classrooms were analyzed using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) questionnaire and the instructor's observations, respectively. The findings revealed that not only did the UCM participants enjoy collaborative learning but also enhanced their learning ability to produce more orally proficient utterances and to expand their gained knowledge in order to scaffold their classmates' conversation.
- انتشار مقاله: 28-01-1399
- نویسندگان: Elahe Solimani,Ahmad Ameri-Golestan,Ahmadreza Lotfi
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: self-efficacy,Task-based language teaching,Computer-assisted language learning,CALL-mediated TBLT,Reading
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: The rich and still expanding literature on TBLT is helping to mature both its theoretical conceptualization and practical implementation in foreign and second language education. Similarly, computer-assisted language learning (CALL) has grown as a field, with the use and integration of technology in the classroom continuing to increase and will continue to play an important role in this maturation process. The present study, hence, reports on an empirical study that investigated the effects of CALL-mediated TBLT on the perceived self- efficacy of Iranian university non-English major EFL students. Through non-probability and convenience sampling, two intact freshmen classes were chosen and randomly assigned as the experimental and the control group. During the treatment sessions, the students in the experimental group received instruction in a CALL-mediated TBLT format, while the control group received no CALL-mediated TBLT instruction but underwent only a task- based instruction on reading without the mediation of CALL. A univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was run, while controlling for pre-intervention scores as the covariate. A significant effect was found for CALL-mediated TBLT (F = 81.450, p = .000, partial eta squared =.504), suggesting CALL-mediated TBLT had a positive effect on the self-efficacy perceptions of the students in the experimental group .
- انتشار مقاله: 12-11-1397
- نویسندگان: Hossein Tavakoli,Ahmadreza Lotfi,Reza Biria
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: language proficiency,Language testing,Generative SLA,UG principles and parameters,learner variable
- چکیده:
- چکیده انگلیسی: This study investigated the relationship between Iranian high school students’ Universal Grammar knowledge and their performance on such standardized general English proficiency tests as PET and FCE internationally administered by Cambridge University. To this end, 108 students were randomly chosen from some high schools located in Malayer from Hamedan. Since this study was correlational in nature, and descriptive and hypothesis-testing by definition, the research participants were given no treatment. Three tests were administered to them instead. To measure UG knowledge, a researcher-made UG test was given to all participants. This test which was made both reliable and valid included pied-piping and preposition stranding principle, binding principle, pro-drop parameter, that-trace effect, projection principle, resumptive pronoun and subjacency principle. To assess the participants’ general English proficiency, PET and FCE tests were run. All participants took the three tests consecutively at two-week intervals after they were given clear and detailed instructions. The findings were manifold. Firstly, there was a significant relationship between UG knowledge and performance on the proficiency tests. Secondly, there existed no significant difference between the proficiency tests as far as the UG test was concerned. Finally, the UG test scores were, through the Cubic regression model, proved to predict the scores gained on both proficiency tests. Most importantly, this study led to some suggestions regarding the learner variables and the under-explored issue of integration of generative SLA and language testing, more specifically standardized general English proficiency tests.
- انتشار مقاله: 15-02-1398
- نویسندگان: Mohammad Mahdi Sharifi,Ahmadreza Lotfi
- مشاهده