در هنگام جستجو کلمه در قسمت عنوان میتوانید کلمات مورد جستجو را با کاراکتر (-) جدا کنید.
کاربرد نوع شرط:
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: مطالعات اجتماعی روان شناختی زنان
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: رضایت زناشویی,زنان,فراتحلیل,اشتغال زنان,پرسشنامه انریچ
- چکیده: اشتغال زنان یکی از مهمترین عواملی است که بر متغیرهای زندگی زناشویی، همچون رضایت زناشویی، تأثیر به سزایی دارد. هدف: پژوهش حاضر در پی آن است که با روش فراتحلیل رضایت زناشویی زنان شاغل و غیرشاغل را مقایسه نماید. تحقیقات فراوانی در این زمینه صورت گرفته است که نتایج بسیار متفاوت و گاه متناقضی را گزارش کرده اند. پژوهش فراتحلیل، مجموعه ای از فنون نظام دار برای حل تناقض در مورد یافته های حاصل از تحقیقات مختلف درباره یک موضوع است. روش: با استفاده از پایگاه های اطلاعاتی داخلی نسبت به جمع آوری تمام پژوهش ها (مقاله و پایاننامه) اقدام شد. نهایتاً 47 مطالعه انجامگرفته بین سالهای 1379 تا 1396 به دست آمد که با استفاده از ملاک های درون سنجی فراتحلیل حاضر، تعداد 18 اثر انتخاب شد. یافته ها: به طور کل، اندازه اثر ترکیبی در مدل اثرات ثابت 180/0 و در مدل اثرات تصادفی 282/0 به دست آمد. نتیجه گیری: اشتغال زنان در رضایت زناشویی تأثیر مثبت معناداری دارد.
- چکیده انگلیسی: Women's employment is one of the most important factors that have a significant impact on marital life variables, such as marital satisfaction. Purpose: The present study seeks to compare the marital satisfaction of employed and unemployed women with the meta-analysis method. A lot of research has been done in this regard, which have reported very different and sometimes contradictory results. The meta-analysis is a set of systematic techniques for solving the contradiction of the findings of various researches on a subject. Methods: Using internal databases, all the research (paper and thesis) was collected. Finally, 47 studies were conducted between 1379 to 1396, that 18 samples were selected using in-depth metrology metrics. Conclusion: In total, the effect size of the combination in the fixed effects model has a constant of 0.180 and in the random effects model of 0.282. Results: Women's employment has a significant positive effect on marital satisfaction. .
- انتشار مقاله: 08-10-1398
- نویسندگان: مهدی فرجی پاک,رضا خجسته مهر,مرتضی امیدیان
- مشاهده
- جایگاه : پژوهشی
- مجله: الهیات تطبیقی
- نوع مقاله: Journal Article
- کلمات کلیدی: پلانتینگا,باور به خدا,مبناگروی,معرفت شناسی اصلاح شده,رویکرد درون گروانه,رویکرد برون گروانه
- چکیده: بینیازانگاری، یکی از دیدگاههای مهم معرفتشناختی درباره معقولیت باور به خدا به شمار میآید. به طور کل، میتوان گفت بر اساس این دیدگاه، باور به وجود خداوند نیازمند هیچگونه استدلال عقلانی نیست. تقریرهای متعددی از این دیدگاه ارائه شده است: یکی از تقریرهای دیدگاه بینیازانگاری را میتوان دیدگاه تجربهگرایی دانست که از سوی افرادی، همچون: سوئینبِرن، آلستون و پلانتینگا ارائه شده است. پلانتینگا درباره معقولیت باور به خدا، دیدگاه معرفتشناسی اصلاح شده را مطرح میکند. تقریر پلانتینگا، در طول آثار وی دو بیان متفاوت داشته است: او در آثار اولیه خود، با اتخاذ رویکردی درون-گروانه از مسأله توجیه، به نقد دیدگاه مبناگروی کلاسیک پرداخته و با طرح تبیینی دیگر از این دیدگاه، باور به خدا را بدون ارائه استدلال عقلانی معقول دانسته است؛ در حالی که در آثار اخیر خود، با ردّ موضع درونگروانه درباره مسأله توجیه، به رویکرد برونگروانه معتقد شده و با ارائه مفهوم تضمین، باور به خدا را بینیاز از استدلال معرفی میکند. این مقاله به ذکر این دو رویکرد متفاوت پلانتینگا در خصوص معقولیت باور به خدا میپردازد.
- چکیده انگلیسی: Various views about the rationality/irrationality of believing in God have been suggested by western religious and secular thinners. The theory of "Basicalism" together with its similar views such as "Evidentialism", "Fideism" and"Pragmatism" is one of the epistemological views posed about the belief in God and seeks to prove its rationality. In general, based on this view, believing in God does not require any rational reasoning. Various versions of this view have been presented so far.One of its versions expressed by scholars like Swinburne, Alston and Plantinga is what is known as Experientialism. In his special exposition of Experientialism – which he refers to as "reformed epistemology" –Plantinga has had two different dictions in his works. In his early woks such as God and other Minds, "Is Belief in God Rational?", "Is Belief in God Properly Basic?" and"Reformed Epistemology and Christian Apologetics", he endeavored to prove the rationality and justificationof believing in God and tried to offer certain and compelling arguments to prove the existence of God. In these works, Plantinga has adopted an internal approach toward the rationality of believing in God and regards it as a basic belief. Criticizing classic foundationalism, he sought to expand a different version of foundationalism according to which God's existence is regarded as basic for a believer. Based on this approach, Palntinga, like other proponents of foundationalism, considers the knowledgea "True Justified Belief". His view is, however, different from other foundationalists in defining the nature of the third element of knowledge. According to Plantinga's early exposition of his theory, the criteria of rationality of believing in God include the principles of classic foundationalism(such as evident to senses, evident to reason and incorrigibility) and other elements. He rejected the deductive-priori method concerning the criteria of determining basic belief and suggested an inductive- posteriori one. Based on this view, the cause behind thebasic nature of belief is an internal aspect and consequently is completely personal and relative. That means any kind of assessment of one's beliefs should be made by referring to his/her cognitional structure. Consequently, no general criterion can be determined for making a belief basic because every individual can offer a specific criterion based on his own cognitional structure which differs from others. Thus, based on this version, the only difference between Plantinga and other foundationalists is in his different view about the basic belief of the individuals. He believes that to determine the basic beliefs, first the person should make distinction between what he considers basic from non-basic ones and then he should introduce a criterion by which his belief becomes basic. Therefore, by looking at the issue from a different angle, he offered a new and more expanded version of the basic beliefs according to which the belief in God becomes quite rational. Plantinga, on the other hand, in his later works (three Warrants)emphasizes that instead of having an internal approach toward the rationality and justification one should have an external approach and consider the believers' beliefs as warranted. This shift in Plantinga's approach stemmed from his theory about epistemological justification of which was reflected in his two impressive works entitled:Warrant: the Current Debateand Warrant and Proper Function(published in 1993). Based on the external approach, he shifts from the notion of justification to Warrant. He considers the rationality of religious belief not in being justifiable, but warranted which can be a guarantee for the rationality of believing in God. On the other hand, he changed the third element of knowledge from "justifiable" to "warranted" and defined the knowledge as "a True Warranted Belief"In this new approach, he doesn't seek to define the justification and the internal criteria of being justifiable, rather he emphasizes the Goldman's reliabilism and speaks out about the man's propercognitional system. Based on this view, if man's cognitional system works properly, he will possess epistemological rationality. In external approach, Plantinga believes that the theistic sensation is a mechanism producing faith which, if having proper condition,can cause a belief which doesn't evidently depend on other beliefs. Thus, if the person's perceiving powers work properly and they aim to catch the truth and there is no barrier, the person's belief in God can be counted as basic.
- انتشار مقاله: 25-03-1395
- نویسندگان: مهدی فرجی پاک,مهدی فرجی پاک,مهدی فرجی پاک
- مشاهده