فرهنگ سیاسی دموکراتیک در میان نسل‌های ایرانی (تحلیل ثانویه داده‌های پیمایش ارزش‌های جهانی برای ایران، اقوام و استان‌های آن)
فرهنگ سیاسی دموکراتیک در میان نسل‌های ایرانی (تحلیل ثانویه داده‌های پیمایش ارزش‌های جهانی برای ایران، اقوام و استان‌های آن)
عنوان فارسی :
فرهنگ سیاسی دموکراتیک در میان نسل‌های ایرانی (تحلیل ثانویه داده‌های پیمایش ارزش‌های جهانی برای ایران، اقوام و استان‌های آن)
عنوان انگلیسی :
Democratic Political Culture among Iranian Generations (A Secondary Analysis of the World Values Survey (WVS) for Iran, Its Ethnics and Provinces)
چکیده:
اهمیت نقش ارزش‌های توده (فرهنگ سیاسی) در گذار به مردم سالاری در سالهای اخیر برجستگی خاصی یافته است. اگرچه دیرینه شناسی مفهومی حکایت از تأکید اندیشمندانی مانند ارسطو و افلاطون بر اهمیت نقش ارزش‌های شهروندان در سیاست دارد، اما در دهههای اخیر و به طور خاص با مطالعه "فرهنگ مدنی" آلموند و وربا بود که توجهات بیش از پیش به این سو رهنمون شد. مطالعه حاضر نیز در همان راستا، البته با طرح نظریات و تجربیات نوتر درباره ارزشها انجام پذیرفته است. داده‌های مورد استفاده برای آزمون فرضیه اصلی تحقیق از مجموعه داده‌های پیمایش جهانی ارزشها WVS، موج پیمایش سالهای 2005 تا 2008 اخذ شده است. این پیمایش در ایران در سال 2007 با 2667 نمونه آماری به انجام رسیده است. در این مجموعه دادهها، استان محل سکونت پاسخگو، در یکی از متغیرهای آن ثبت شده است، لذا امکان مقایسه میزان ارزش‌های رهایی بخش پاسخگویان به تفکیک استانی و البته قومی مهیا شده است. در این پژوهش استانهایی که تعداد نمونه آنها در مجموعه دادهها زیر 40 نفر بودند، حذف شدند و استان‌های خراسان جنوبی و شمالی نیز با استان خراسان رضوی ادغام گردیده و در کل با نام استان خراسان در تحلیلها آمدهاند. یافتههای این پژوهش هم در بخش توصیفی و هم در بخش تحلیل، مطابق با انتظارات نظری نوشتار، حاکی از برتری نسل جوان در بروز ارزش‌های ابراز وجود و توسعه بیشتر فرهنگ دموکراتیک در میان این نسل است. جالب آنکه، این تفاوت در بروز ارزش‌های دموکراتیک تقریباً در همه سطوح بازتولید شده است؛ بدین معنا که علاوه بر سطح ملی، در سطوح فروملی بررسی شده؛ یعنی قومی و استانی و نیز به تفکیک جنسیت، تقریباً نتایج مشابهی به دست آمد؛ هرچند در سطح ملی، تفاوت بسیار آشکارتر و در سطوح فروملی با پیچیدگیهایی همراه بود.
چکیده انگلیسی:
The role of values of the masses in transition to democracy has become particularly salient in recent years. The conceptual genealogy indicates the emphasis of thinkers like Aristotle and Plato on the importance of the role of citizens’ values in policy, yet in recent decades the research on the ‘civic culture’ conducted by investigators such as Almond and Verba´s has increasingly directed attention to this phenomenon. The present study is carried out in the same way as those of the above, but has utilized more innovative ideas and experiences on the subject of values. Generally, political culture is based on the cultural and political ties and particularly, speaks about effects of culture, beliefs and values on policy in the society. Larry Diamond has reminded that "since democracy requires a set of political values and orientations of citizens such as balance, tolerance, civility, efficiency, knowledge and participation, political culture is considered as a major contributor in strengthening of democracy" (1999:161). Ronald Inglehart argues that, currently culture plays a more vital role over than the past two decades of literature of democracy. In his view, economic development leads to gradual changes in the culture; so that people increasingly demand democratic institutions and they are going to be more supportive for democracy (Inglehart 2000: 6-95). From the Paradigmatic perspective, among the political culture studies, three main approaches can be separated: Legitimacy approach (System-support approach), Communitarians approach (Social Capital approach) and the Human Development approach (Emancipative approach) (Inglehart and Welzel, 2009: 572).Some advocates of the legitimacy approach view democracy as a limited set of institutional mechanisms which regulate the official policy. In this approach, democracy does not require democrat citizens. It is sufficient to have a majority who trust these institutions in a satisfactory level and prefer democracy to other alternative systems of government. Two other approaches (Communitarians and Human Development approaches), follow the tradition of civic culture school. From their point of view, efficiency of democracy requires a wide range of citizenship values. Communitarians approach emphasizes the values which link citizens to daily life and strengthen their loyalty to the community (Bell, 1993: 82-85). They emphasize volunteer activities and interpersonal trust as the general context in which democracy can flourish. Thinkers of Human Development believe that one of the important aspects of the civic values is self-expression values. Ronald Inglehart and colleagues changing the formulation of the Modernization theory, insist on the importance of self-expression values on the reinforcing of democratic institutions (1389, 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2009).In the political realm, the growth of post-industrial value, leads to loss of respect for authority and growing emphasis on participation and self-expression. These trends are the beginning of democracy in authoritarian societies and an origin for elite-challenging in the relatively democratic societies. According to Inglehart and Welzel's theory, the type of political culture appropriate with effective or formal democracy, involves Human Development syndromes or self-expression values, or in other words "emancipative values"(Welzel and Inglehart, 2009: 132). In the decades of 60 and 70, youth and relations between generations as a social phenomenon attract attention of analysts and experts of social problems. Karl Mannheim was the first theorist who introduced the concept of generation. This concept was utilized to study the development of conservative thought in modern societies. In Mannheim view, the rapid changes in environment and technological alteration play an important role in intensifying the intellectual and cultural differences between generations (Lavar, 1373: 190). As Inglehart and his colleagues express, one of the most important trends of intergenerational substitution occurs in the domain of transition from traditional values to self- expression values or the more generally transition from materialistic values to post-materialistic values. They consider actions like "increasing in elite-challenging forms of civic action", "strive towards gender equality" and "tolerant attitude to another" is going to be much more common among the younger generation and be regarded as normal action. In Iran, concern for democracy dates back to the Constitutional Revolution, about one hundred years ago. After that, many historical opportunities for democratization have occurred and this trend has continued to the present time. On the other hand, since the social, political and cultural values and norms of the society survive through transmission from generation to generation, so it could be said that survival of any society depends on the flow of cultural transmission in that community. Indeed, the Culture and Civilization of any society survives via intergenerational interactions. Therefore, democratic values as all values and beliefs will be conveyed to next generations; however this movement might be a salutatory transmission. Accordingly, this study attempts to answer these questions: - Similarities and differences between the three generations (young, middle aged and old) in terms of democratic political culture at national level. - Similarities and differences between the three generations in terms of democratic political culture at sub-national level.
خبرنامه
برای ثبت نام در خبرنامه و دریافت خبرنامه ایمیل خود را وارد نمایید.
